🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from abuse, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop laws and assistance programs to eliminate all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a major setback for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the EU in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality undermines family values and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent vote has provoked broad outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Potential Next Steps

The head of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could possibly return the bill for further consideration if he holds objections.

President the national leader stated on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "considering state and legal factors, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for women's rights not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's vote could influence comparable debates in additional member states